<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monster A-Go Go (1965)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/monster-a-go-go-1965/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/monster-a-go-go-1965/</link>
	<description>Bravely watching the movies that others don&#039;t dare...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UncleSam300</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/monster-a-go-go-1965/comment-page-1/#comment-5970</link>
		<dc:creator>UncleSam300</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=564#comment-5970</guid>
		<description>I think that the only right word to describe it is DREADFUL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the only right word to describe it is DREADFUL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guts3d</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/monster-a-go-go-1965/comment-page-1/#comment-5969</link>
		<dc:creator>guts3d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=564#comment-5969</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that I can handle seeing this without the MST3K crew. Incoherent? Bizarre? Incompetent? Abysmal? I can&#039;t think of one word that describes this cheese-fest!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that I can handle seeing this without the MST3K crew. Incoherent? Bizarre? Incompetent? Abysmal? I can&#8217;t think of one word that describes this cheese-fest!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UncleSam300</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/monster-a-go-go-1965/comment-page-1/#comment-5966</link>
		<dc:creator>UncleSam300</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=564#comment-5966</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that Monster A-Go Go has no comments. This is the worst movie ever made! 
I really enjoied the review. It&#039;s very ironic, but it&#039;s the only way to speak about this movie if you don&#039;t want to cry!
Seriously, this movie was born on the wake of the low budget sci-fi movie of the 50&#039;s (such as the well- known Plan 9 from Outer Space). I&#039;ve never understood why in that period lots of directors wanted to make sci-fi/horror movie with low budgets. Everyone knows that the most difficult kind of movie to make with a low budget is the sci-fi. Maybe that was the only way to capture the attention of the audience, in a period (the 50&#039;s) in which space, aliens, and flying saucers were the only exploitable subjects for the independent productions (because the revolution came only in the 60&#039;s with the couple Lewis-Friedman).
But this movie isn&#039;t only bad because it was realized with a very low budget, but because it has the most strange and troubled production history. When Bill Rebane wrote Monster A-Go Go it was already bad. And also the footage shot by Rebane was bad. After this you know the story, the production run out of money, and 4 years later H.G. Lewis bought the footage and completed the movie, alterating that bad scrip written by Rebane and shooting other footage with different actors, useless scenes and adding a narrator voice (his voice). This was his greatest mistake (among the others). 
But I think taht Monster A-Go Go has its importance. On one hand it revealed us how a movie can be so dreadful, and on the other it evidenced the mistakes that a director should never made.
After all this movie is funny because is nor scary nor frightening as Rebane wanted (I suppose, because is a kind of horror movie), and it leaves you confused and disappointed, and at the end you think &quot;Why they made it?&quot;. Money, notoriety? I don&#039;t know. However surely it became famous the same, but only because it was so bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that Monster A-Go Go has no comments. This is the worst movie ever made!<br />
I really enjoied the review. It&#8217;s very ironic, but it&#8217;s the only way to speak about this movie if you don&#8217;t want to cry!<br />
Seriously, this movie was born on the wake of the low budget sci-fi movie of the 50&#8242;s (such as the well- known Plan 9 from Outer Space). I&#8217;ve never understood why in that period lots of directors wanted to make sci-fi/horror movie with low budgets. Everyone knows that the most difficult kind of movie to make with a low budget is the sci-fi. Maybe that was the only way to capture the attention of the audience, in a period (the 50&#8242;s) in which space, aliens, and flying saucers were the only exploitable subjects for the independent productions (because the revolution came only in the 60&#8242;s with the couple Lewis-Friedman).<br />
But this movie isn&#8217;t only bad because it was realized with a very low budget, but because it has the most strange and troubled production history. When Bill Rebane wrote Monster A-Go Go it was already bad. And also the footage shot by Rebane was bad. After this you know the story, the production run out of money, and 4 years later H.G. Lewis bought the footage and completed the movie, alterating that bad scrip written by Rebane and shooting other footage with different actors, useless scenes and adding a narrator voice (his voice). This was his greatest mistake (among the others).<br />
But I think taht Monster A-Go Go has its importance. On one hand it revealed us how a movie can be so dreadful, and on the other it evidenced the mistakes that a director should never made.<br />
After all this movie is funny because is nor scary nor frightening as Rebane wanted (I suppose, because is a kind of horror movie), and it leaves you confused and disappointed, and at the end you think &#8220;Why they made it?&#8221;. Money, notoriety? I don&#8217;t know. However surely it became famous the same, but only because it was so bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

