<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Thing (1982)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-thing-1982/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-thing-1982/</link>
	<description>Bravely watching the movies that others don&#039;t dare...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:11:37 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: popzombie</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-thing-1982/comment-page-1/#comment-2411</link>
		<dc:creator>popzombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=862#comment-2411</guid>
		<description>Great  movie. Everyone in it did a great job. I also love the props instead of lame cgi. I was creeped out by the good Doctor Copper&#039;s nose ring. WHY???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great  movie. Everyone in it did a great job. I also love the props instead of lame cgi. I was creeped out by the good Doctor Copper&#8217;s nose ring. WHY???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-thing-1982/comment-page-1/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=862#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>I think the guy won an Academy award for the effect&#039;s work...didn&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the guy won an Academy award for the effect&#8217;s work&#8230;didn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guts3d</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-thing-1982/comment-page-1/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>Guts3d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=862#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>This was one scary movie. I agree that the special effects were top notch, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was one scary movie. I agree that the special effects were top notch, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-thing-1982/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=862#comment-630</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll second the suggestion for the use of real props, but not because I have anything against CGI.  CGI can look very real when done right, but the thing you&#039;d really want to use it for is stuff you CAN&#039;T do physically, like super smooth, fluid morphs. What I liked most about the Thing&#039;s transformations, however, was how messy they are.  Organs shift, joints pop into place, skin tears and blood flows, all of it adding to the horror.  Destructive transformation like that are something best suited to physical props, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll second the suggestion for the use of real props, but not because I have anything against CGI.  CGI can look very real when done right, but the thing you&#8217;d really want to use it for is stuff you CAN&#8217;T do physically, like super smooth, fluid morphs. What I liked most about the Thing&#8217;s transformations, however, was how messy they are.  Organs shift, joints pop into place, skin tears and blood flows, all of it adding to the horror.  Destructive transformation like that are something best suited to physical props, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-thing-1982/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=862#comment-264</guid>
		<description>If they ever do remake this I really hope they use &quot;real&quot; props instead of CGI...CGI always looks so fakey to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they ever do remake this I really hope they use &#8220;real&#8221; props instead of CGI&#8230;CGI always looks so fakey to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al s</title>
		<link>http://www.monstershack.net/sp/index.php/the-thing-1982/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>al s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monstershack.net/sp/?p=862#comment-262</guid>
		<description>I loved it too and hope someday someone will remake this one and do as good a job as Carpenter did remaking the original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved it too and hope someday someone will remake this one and do as good a job as Carpenter did remaking the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
