The new “Thing”…hmmmm

First, let me just shout:

“Beware SPOILERS, all ye who enter here…”

I managed to sneak out to the movies last Friday and see the new “The Thing” with some friends and, boy, I really, really wanted to like the movie more than I did, but I just couldn’t.

Why not?:

1) No character development
It seemed like every time somebody got killed I was like…”Who was that?”. The characters just seemed to exist solely to be killed by a monster. You never really saw anybody DO anything except drinking and getting killed. (Yeah, I know, the Doctor and the helicopter pilots had things to do, but, for example, who was the other woman on the post? What was she doing there? etc etc.)

2) No sense of “Who Dunnit?”
People just seemed to be inexplicably infected just to be able to move along to the next “gross-out transformation scene”. In the first one (1982), I was constantly trying to figure out who was alone with who?; where was he just now?; etc etc. Here, people suddenly got a weird look on their face and….”BLARGH! I’m a Thing! Look how gross I am!”

3) CGI
The creature effects ranged from Good to really, really bad. When the first thing popped out of the guy on the helicopter I was thinking, “oh no…that’s pretty bad.” And after that, I just could never really get back “into” the movie. Why couldn’t they just create real models of the monster like they did before?! It just totally ruins the mood when you can see that it’s a cartoon hand/head/tentacle/mouth etc…ugh. What a bummer.

4) The “Thing”
This monster in no way acted like the “Thing” should act. The Thing is supposed to hide, lay low, and then strike when somebody is isolated. The “thing” in this movie just seems to pop out of somebody and go ape-shit trying to kill everybody in the room, chasing people down hallways, etc. etc. It never seems to try and run away into the darkness and snow to hide like before. Kind of strange.

5) The UFO
Oh boy. Why? Still money left over in the CGI budget?

Now, before you complain that I’m a grumpy old man, here’s what I did like:

The final tie-in with the previous film is well done. (But the dog doesn’t look the same, but, hell, let’s overlook that.)

The Norwegian actors are fun to see and hear, and I’m glad they weren’t totally overshadowed by the Americans. (I live in Norway, so maybe I’m a bit biased:) )

By the way, why did they have to go all the way to America to hire a lousy paleontologist? And why were the helicopter pilots American? As one reviewer pointed out: it’s too bad the studio didn’t have the balls to film the movie entirely in Norwegian with English subtitles…that would have been cool.

Curious to hear what other people think as well.

4 comments to The new “Thing”…hmmmm

  • guts3d

    I am still looking forward to seeing this, I’ll prolly have to wait for the release on DVD. On a similar note, my wife dragged me to see the “Girl Who Played With Fire”, “Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest”, and “Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” movies, and I must admit I liked them, even with the subtitles. Hearing the language and seeing the equivalent words printed underneath was odd. So I guess a Sci-Fi movie with all norwegian actors speaking their native language would be fine by me, as long as it was a rousing story with great effects and a decent plot.

  • Sean

    Hey grumpy old man! What’s all this complaining about “character development” (whatever the heck that is)? And in the year 2011 shouldn’t we all be convinced that all Hollywood needs when creating a monster is CGI? On the plus side, since I lack “guts3d’s” sweet nature, I think I’ll wait till this epic is released on DVD or Blueray and write a review. I’m sure I’ll be completely impartial even after you’ve trashed the movie on the site!

  • Now, now, I didn’t thoroughly trash it, I was just disappointed. I really tried to be constructively critical, but who’s going to listen to an old crabby man like me?

  • Sean

    Other crabby old men? (And don’t look at me when I say that.)

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>